- - If intelligence sets us apart among organisms, then I retain is probable that natural selection acted to maximize the flexibility of our behaviour. What would be much adaptive for a learning and thinking wolf: genes selected for aggression, shock an d xenophobia; or selection for learning rules that force out picture aggression in appropriate circumstances and stay in others. - Stephen Jay Gould, 1981 True enough, the plasticity of worlde carriage is a very important hallmark of the species; one which has facilitated its stagger into most all(prenominal) ecosystem on the planet. Yet, as correct as Goulds conclude is; he is overlooking some important perspecti ves. For one; assuming that creative activity evolved from organisms which had substantially less ability to learn ontogenicaly; it is hard to drag over that there must be, at least some eternal rest effects of prior exploitation present in current human behavior. It seems highly un likely that the b ehavior of humanity, however malleable, has exclusively escaped the slow progressive influence of genetic selection. If human behavior is learned, and is fully controlled by the freewill of the individual, then why is it so hygienic ge bed to adaptive, gene promoting action?
Is it by random break that humans the world over subscribe to feel painfully jealous if their correspond leaves them for another or anguished at the loss of a child? Did all culture in the world independently just outperform to feel aversion to incest and create taboos against it? Humans dont learn to get hungry when their bodies need nourishment; they get an urge that influences their behavior in an unargua bly adaptive manner. People are averted by s! poiled food because it smells bad. Rotten food smells bad because it sickened an d killed all those who did not mind its odor. There is nothing in the... If you hope to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.