CARS Decision Making Technique Article Review - MGT 350: Critical Thinking (article review of a decision making technique, including applications and limitations)

CARS Decision Making Technique Article Re suck in

While conducting internet inquiry on various critical cerebration and decision-making techniques that are available, I came across some material written by Robert Harris, a retired university English professor who now spends his time writing articles and essays on creative problem solving, using the Web as a research tool, avoiding plagiarism and other topics related to critical thinking and research. One article, Evaluating Internet Research Sources (Harris, 1997), introduced an innovative idea ab initio intended for research, but it can in addition be use towards decision-making in the business. This method is called CARS, which stands for credibility, accuracy, erudition and support.

Credibility

The first step in evaluation and decision-making is to determine the credibility of the source that is providing the material or issue. The listener or researcher should search for evidence of legitimacy and reliability as the material is provided. Some key tests that should be applied include checking the authors credibility or credentials, ensuring evidence of forest control for the material, looking for meta study (Harris, 1997), and check for indicators of lack of credibility. Some indicators, in particular for written material, can include anonymity, lack of quality control, oppose metainformation and bad grammar or misspelled words.

Accuracy

The second step of evaluating research materials or analyzing input for decision-making is to conduct an accuracy test to assure that the information is actually correct (Harris, 1997). Some concepts that will help in the accuracy test include checking for timeliness, comprehensiveness, audience and purpose.



In addition, unitary should watch for indicators of lack of accuracy, which may include no exit on the document, vague or sweeping generalizations, old naming on information and a very one sided view that does not acknowledge opposing views or respond to them (Harris, 1997).

Reasonableness

Checking for reasonableness includes examining the information...

this essay is damn good. it has a lot of useful information, and goes to owing(p) lengths to explain the different sections of CARS. captivating introduction also. the essay was also arranged well, along with good sources at the bottom.

If you want to tie a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .